Logical Fallacy facts
While investigating facts about Logical Fallacy Examples and Logical Fallacy Definition, I found out little known, but curios details like:
The belief that anyone who disagrees with you must be stupid, uninformed, irrational, or worse is a logical fallacy called Naïve realism.
how to identify a logical fallacy?
"kafkatrapping", a logical fallacy in which someone is accused of possessing a certain trait and their denial is used as evidence that they possess that trait.
What logical fallacy should you watch out?
In my opinion, it is useful to put together a list of the most interesting details from trusted sources that I've come across answering what logical fallacy does this example contain. Here are 23 of the best facts about Logical Fallacy List and Logical Fallacy Meaning I managed to collect.
what logical fallacy is used in this passage?
-
"begs the question" doesn't mean 'asks the question', and instead is a logical fallacy that means 'the conclusion lacks support'.
-
Marco Polo makes no mention of the Great Wall in any of his writings on China, which some people believe proves he never visited the country. This type of conclusion is called "argument from silence" and is a common logical fallacy.
-
The 'appeal to nature' is a logical fallacy where people assume that something is either good because it's perceived as "natural", or bad because it's perceived as "unnatural".
-
There is a logical fallacy named "The Fallacy-Fallacy". In which one assumes a claim is false because the author used a fallacy or made a bad argument.
-
Reductio ad Hitlerum, a logical fallacy first mentioned in 1951. It occurs when an argument is said to be invalid because Hitler put forth the same argument.
-
A "Red Herring" logical fallacy is a point in an argument that misleads or distracts from the issue at hand. E.g. "If the world's 15 largest cargo ships don't burn the low grade fuel, someone will." Doesn't make the low grade fuel any more reasonable for the ships to burn it.
-
There is a logical fallacy called the fallacy fallacy, the fallacy of overusing fallacy in the analysis of arguments
-
About the fallacy fallacy, which is when an argument is presumed to be wrong just because it has a logical fallacy in it
-
Begging the question" is a logical fallacy, and does not mean "raises the question"
Logical Fallacy data charts
For your convenience take a look at Logical Fallacy figures with stats and charts presented as graphic.
Why are non sequiturs considered a logical fallacy?
You can easily fact check why is ad hominem a logical fallacy by examining the linked well-known sources.
Appeal to Hypocrisy: "It is a [logical] fallacy because the moral character or past actions of the opponent are generally irrelevant to the logic of the argument."
Think of the children" is an "appeal to emotion, and therefore it becomes a logical fallacy." - source
A fallacy of division occurs when one reasons logically that something true for the whole must also be true of all or some of its parts. - source
The Motte and Bailey logical fallacy, in which someone switches between a "motte" (an easy-to-defend and often common-sense statement, such as "culture shapes our experiences") and a "bailey" (a hard-to-defend and more controversial statement,
Mike Rugnetta from PBS Idea Channel has a YouTube playlist full of individual videos explaining common logical fallacies that you can send to people on the internet you argue with when they commit one. - source
Which logical fallacy occurs when a speaker assumes?
There is a logical fallacy for assuming that just because someone's logic is faulty that their conclusion is wrong. It's name? The Fallacy Fallacy.
How to write a logical fallacy essay?
Argumentum ad hominem is an informal logical fallacy where one the evades the actual topic of argument by directing an attack at their opponent.
Chances are good that you've fallen for these four logical fallacies in the past. How can we protect ourselves moving forward or avoid making these mistakes ourselves? Our newest episode answers all that - and more!
The exact parameters of The Texas Sharpshooter, a logical fallacy that arises from cherrypicking data and arguments to suit your own and only your own argument.
The 'appeal to the stone' is a logical fallacy which occurs when someone simply dismisses evidence that they disagree with as absurd, without providing any evidence which proves why it's wrong.
Kafkatrapping' is a proposed logical fallacy of an unfalsifiable argument that attempts to overcome guilt by using denial as further evidence of guilt. Designated victims of the accusation who question the theory are thereby considered not authentic victims.